Saturday, October 15, 2011

LOKPAL BILL ANNA VS GOVT.


Lokpal Bill
...Understanding  the Drafts of Government and Civil Society
Government’s Lokpal 
Directed against those who raise their voiceagainst corruption?
Only 65,000 people out of 1.2 crore
Only Group A  Central Govt employees
Instead of ALL Govt employees
Provides illegitimate protection to the corrupt officials? 
If a citizen complains against a govt officer’s corruption to Lokpal…
•Govt officer can file a Cross Complaint directly to the Special Court 

without Preliminary Enquiry that whether complain was frivolous
•Govt officer given free advocate while the Citizen has to defend himself
•If complain proved frivolous citizen gets minimum 2 years jail

•If corruption of Govt officer proved – gets minimum 6 months jail
Pro-accused investigation process?
After preliminary enquiry, accused given a hearing before filing an FIR to explain why an FIR should not be registered against him. 
After completion of investigations, presented evidence & again given a hearing to explain why a case should not be filed in the court
During investigations, if investigations are to be started against any new persons,
they too would be presented with evidence against them & given hearing
Increased risk to whistleblowers
Nowhere else in the world is Criminal Jurisprudence like this!
Jan Lokpal Draft                                              Government’s Draft


                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                 PM kept out of Lokpal’s purview
.

• Lokpal should have power to investigate                                       

frivolous & mischievous complaints
• Special safeguards provided against

allegations of corruption against PM
• Lokpal should have power to investigate
 allegations of corruption against Judiciary•                                Judiciary kept out of Lokpal’s purview.
Special safeguards provided against
 frivolous & mischievous complaints

Government wants it to be included in Judicial Accountability Bill In  JAB permission to enquire against a judge will be given by a Three member committee, Two judges & a retd Chief justice of the SAM
E court).. If only a strong and effective JAB were considered & enacted simultaneously

Critical Issues – Judiciary 
• Judicial Accountability Bill (JAB), drafted by the government, does not
talk of bribery by the judges. It only talks of “misbehavior”.
• National Oversight Committee sought to be created through JAB will not
have the police and investigative powers and machinery to deal with
criminal complaints of bribery, which Lokpal would have. Therefore, the
two bills actually complement each other.
• Even if judicial corruption were included in JAB, it is not clear when
would an effective JAB become a reality? Should we wait endlessly till
JAB became a reality?


Investigation process provided by the government would severely
COMPROMISE ALL INVESTIGATIONS
If evidence were made available to the accused at various stages of investigations,it would also 
REVEAL IDENTITY OF WHISTLEBLOWERS
compromising their security 
Such a pro-accused process of Criminal 
Jurisprudence NOWHERE IN THE WORLD 
Such process would 
KILL ALMOST EVERY CASE !!!!


No comments:

Post a Comment